Public information and competing accounts

A writer shapes a reader’s view by selecting which facts or voices to emphasise. Compare what is included with what the task or situation would lead a reader to need. Do not assume omission proves deliberate deception; space, purpose and audience also matter. Identify a consequence for understanding.

The model “A report gives costs but no explanation of benefits.” illustrates the method in a specific context. Compare it with “A brochure highlights pleasant spaces and omits repair work.”. The useful question is how the change in wording affects meaning, emphasis or the relationship with the reader. A strong response connects a precise language choice to its purpose; naming a feature alone is insufficient. Explain the connection in ordinary language before adding a technical term. When reviewing your own response, remove unsupported claims and check that every detail serves the task you have been given.

වැඩි විස්තර අවශ්‍ය විට පමණක් මෙම කොටස කියවන්න.

Two articles about the same event may emphasise different people, causes or consequences. Begin with their shared topic, then compare the perspective supported by wording and selected detail. Similar formats do not guarantee similar viewpoints. Explain both the idea and the choice used to communicate it.

The model “One report centres on travellers; another centres on transport workers.” illustrates the method in a specific context. Compare it with “Both describe disruption, but they assign different importance to its causes.”. The useful question is how the change in wording affects meaning, emphasis or the relationship with the reader. A strong response connects a precise language choice to its purpose; naming a feature alone is insufficient. Explain the connection in ordinary language before adding a technical term. When reviewing your own response, remove unsupported claims and check that every detail serves the task you have been given.

වැඩි විස්තර අවශ්‍ය විට පමණක් මෙම කොටස කියවන්න.

Evidence must match the claim it supports. Check date, context, sample and the difference between correlation and cause when relevant. A true fact can be irrelevant to the argument. Explain the gap precisely, and propose the kind of information that would help without inventing data.

The model “A survey of one class cannot represent every learner automatically.” illustrates the method in a specific context. Compare it with “A library’s large collection does not by itself prove that it is well used.”. The useful question is how the change in wording affects meaning, emphasis or the relationship with the reader. A strong response connects a precise language choice to its purpose; naming a feature alone is insufficient. Explain the connection in ordinary language before adding a technical term. When reviewing your own response, remove unsupported claims and check that every detail serves the task you have been given.

වැඩි විස්තර අවශ්‍ය විට පමණක් මෙම කොටස කියවන්න.